Children may dream, but they don’t dream as we do. They live in the angled brightness we only escape to in sleep. When they say: I had a dream, they might mean: Mommie told me. When we say: I’ve been dreaming about you, it’s because we’re too timid to say: My fantasy self penetrates and partially devours your fantasy self. Try it. You’ll see why we hesitate. So I wonder: which is this? The nonsense narrative of a toddler on a water slide, or my dream last night. I was at the office. Right? But not the office? More like a museum? And my boss was a painting? Not the whole painting? Just one of the background figures that—if you didn’t have time to see because you were listening to those headphones and they told you to move to the next painting—you might not even notice? But I had to listen? Because his voice came over the headphones? And then I realized it was your voice? And you were my boss? And that’s when I tried to quit, but you said I hadn’t begun to do the job you had hired me to do and I couldn’t quit, because quitting implied that the job had failed me but it was me who had failed? So I cut you out of the painting and devoured you? And the guard had me arrested because you can’t eat the paintings, but the judge didn’t want to convict me because his son hadn’t done his job either, but the jury was background people from paintings and they were not sympathetic because a lot of people had failed to notice them? So now I’m in a painting but you’ll never find me? But all I want is for you to find me?
Copyright © November 16, 2006 David Hodges
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 17, 2006 at 2:55 am
mshahin
This was quite surreal. Felt like I was in the familiar and at the same time off of the edge. “My fantasy self penetrates and partially devours your fantasy self.” Intriguing!
Towards the end of the story is amazing. I don’t think I’ll ever look at paintings the same way again 🙂
Don’t look at them at all without a lifeline, they can suck you in.
–David
November 17, 2006 at 4:36 pm
red dirt girl
So, D, now I am in a painting, but you’ll never find me . . . and, do you think, all I want is just for you to find me? or move on to the next painting with your headphones on and miss the fine details . . . wow, I believe my reality has just become fantasy or my fantasy has just become reality . . . my now new favorite, D . . . masterful . . . .
-rdg
Actually, you were hiding in the spam filter, but now you’re back on canvas.
–David
November 17, 2006 at 9:23 pm
caveblogem
Nice one, David. These stories of yours always make me think. Thanks.
November 20, 2006 at 4:06 am
litlove
I do like the use of the interrogative, which seems after all to be the heart of the dream. It’s not the manifest content, which is the viewing and the eating of the picture (for naturally desire is what dreams are always composed of), but the latent and therefore more powerful content of dreams which is the process of questioning what we think we experienced.
I think you’re onto something here, litlove. Dreams mean nothing until we describe them to someone else and, just to make ourselves clear, translate them back into the language of our waking needs and fears.
–David
November 27, 2006 at 12:00 pm
extrapolater
I love the early description of children’s lives. I have a 4-year-old, so I wonder how he sees the world often.
You probably didn’t learn much here. But it did occur to me one day, while retelling a dream: it’s like a four-year-old narrating my day at the office!
–David
November 28, 2006 at 7:18 am
Annelisa
mmmm, know this sort of dream… The real made wierd, and the wierd made real = surreal. Great post! I’m going to have to link back, so I can return and read more!
Thanks, Annelisa. Two more links and you’ll have a chain.
–David
… and if I made them of paper, and there’s enough links by christmas, I’ll be able to hang it in a garland across the living room! 🙂
November 28, 2006 at 10:28 am
mystic rose
yeah…much like dreams i have..