You are all women to me; that, as I understand it, is the nature of marriage. However you endure me is how I’m withstood by the feminine gender, so wear the pink pants for me, if you don’t mind, you know the pants, it’s what I’d have all girls and women do, and look back at me over your shoulder in the way that makes a silhouette of your one breast (your three-billion-breasts-in-one), and in return I’ll, in return I don’t know what I’ll do until you tell me; it’s up to you. And no shirt, if that’s okay. You want the vote, I know, you made that clear, you marched for that. You appear to want to be consulted, not merely informed, on issues that don’t concern you, why I’m not sure, but you only need to tell me, while you’re in those pants, of course, and I’ll comply. After that, I’m confused, but to that point I’m clear. You seem—I know this sounds implausible—among your curvy and most delectable selves, simultaneously to support competing viewpoints, when what I’m listening for is a single clear word of unambiguous longing. You’d learned, I thought, or ought to have, the perils of leaving me to choose. I’ve taken a poll, the only way I know how, by asking you the same questions repeatedly over the years. The results, as they say, are in. By a small margin, women agree I’m a reasonable if not an overwhelming candidate for marriage, not entirely unattractive, to some degree a provider, faultless?, no, not a box of chocolates: an easy catch. If I had my life to live over, I just, I wouldn’t do it. I wouldn’t put myself through it. Men like me, if my opinion counts for anything.
Copyright © January 5, 2000 David Hodges
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 5, 2007 at 3:57 pm
litlove
Oh ho, playing with fire in the gender game today, David! I love this line ‘what I’m listening for is a single clear word of unambiguous longing’ – if my husband knew how to write, he’d write it like that, I’m sure. An intriguing distillation of that most ‘masculine’ point of view, where sexuality is a loud siren song, and reason is a simple either/or. The brilliantly lucid confusion of the y-chromosome telling its autobiography.
I’m sorry, litlove, was there a YES in there?
–David
February 6, 2007 at 12:55 am
archiearchive
I thought you had read my mind. That same line Litlove quoted is the story of my post-feminist male life. If I make a unilateral decision I am a MCP. If I ask for assistance in a decision – “Do you want to change cities?”, “Where should we go for dinner?”, “Will you want sex tonight?” – I get wild prevarications which, when distilled mean “Don’t you know?” So then I make a decision; which is always wrong.
I do hope Buff doesn’t visit here for a day or two 🙂
Embrace the cluelessness, brother.
–David
February 6, 2007 at 12:24 pm
jill terry
You give us too much power, when what we really want is to be taken by the hand and led gently through the fog, into the clearing where a hero would be born.
See, now that helps! Do you speak for the group?
–David
Undoubtedly, although most would not admit it!
February 6, 2007 at 5:02 pm
red dirt girl
an unambiguous YES……………i’m a direct kind of gal.
Damn! Does that mean you’ll wear the pink pants?
–David
Yes, pink pants – absolutely…………can they have a velvet ribbon wound around the top??????
February 7, 2007 at 11:21 pm
Lakshmi
David, Men are visual! Women seek power! What can I say? Go ‘figure’ !
More clues! Archie, are you paying attention?
–David
February 8, 2008 at 3:17 pm
D-Boy
There’s only one cure for what ails this guy!
Thanks, D-Boy. Would you be willing to spell it out in a single, unambiguous word?
–David