Mister Oldman is a sweet old man and a sweet old man shall I be, when my business is done and my children don’t come and my needs are as simple as these. Something new is among us now, ladies and gentlemen, the aged. We don’t know what to do with them, brittle and residual, though the foundations they chair can be nimble. Time was, they were taken off by invaders, mauled by big cats, dispatched over the weekend by simple viruses. Now nothing kills them. They no longer throw themselves on swords or float away on rafts of ice. So, if they’re lucky in traffic and don’t kill themselves out of boredom, they survive to obsolescence like the rest of us, but the upgrades don’t take. The ergonomic opposite of a perpetual motion machine, Mister Oldman here absorbs increasingly larger investments of energy with diminishing returns. Example: to receive one answer now requires asking the same question three times. Keep signing the checks, Mister Oldman. Yes, friends, remedies are slow to evolve. New uses for the aged will emerge, but for now it’s a challenge. They easily break and replacement parts are prohibitive. Sadly, too, they don’t learn, and what they know is quaintly fading. And while they process food and air, the end products are not highly prized. Sorry, there may be time for questions later. Mister Oldman has offered to mentor. He has vivid but unlikely memories of learning chess and Euclid from his beloved granny. We seek mentees not averse to Mister Oldman’s infirmities and, further, will soon publish Essence of Oldman in less-creaky digital formats. His will be the go-to guide for those wishing to make fixed-size fonts of movable type from lead ingots. Also, strategies for cribbage. Thank you, I have a date.
Copyright © February 17, 2007 David Hodges
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 17, 2007 at 2:34 pm
litlove
Well I don’t know, David, for all this is a piece about the elderly it has a fabulous vitality to it. And you reveal a delightfully dry wit (‘the ergonomic opposite of a perpetual motion machine’). I gave you a round of applause when I got to the end of it. Please feel free to take a bow.
Thank you, litlove. I would bow but my hips are a little creaky.
–David
February 18, 2007 at 4:28 am
Anthony
It’s sad to watch someone grow old to the point they have no quality of life, and can’t be very useful…if at all. Even if “new uses will emerge”, I can’t see how they could be very positive uses.
Not to mention the problem of the useless young. Thanks for your visit and comment, Anthony!
–David
February 20, 2007 at 10:08 am
ngriffin
I loved the story, as well. Having worked as a nurse in a nursing home for years, “new uses do emerge”, but please do not be under the misconception they are useless for most are truly positive.
I will tell the narrator, who is a thoughtless egotist, what he’s missing.
–David
February 20, 2007 at 11:59 am
Rose
Interesting story, but an aging person is far from useless.
No more useless than the rest of us, Rose. Thank you for your visit and comment.
–David
February 21, 2007 at 4:05 pm
ombudsben
As one factotum to (perhaps) another, I disengage from my functions long enough to read this, congratulate you, and return to my useful, functional, cogitations and machinations. Built-in obsolescence, indeed.
I see you installed the latest language upgrade! Thanks, Ben.
–David
March 3, 2007 at 7:22 am
Annelisa
True, true… it’s not a matter of uselessness, but lack of appreciation for the model.
These days, when everything is new every ten minutes, we’re all getting older faster, staying older longer.
–David