My favorite Thursday couple, smug but theoretically generous, sufficient to one another and seemingly self-contained, aspired to something more. To hear her talk of the baby was to be present at his creation. Of words she formed his little head with its wispy hair redolent of soap and spilled milk. She pressed the word Lips to the word Forehead and graced the baby’s path with choice and welcoming wide horizons. Yes, she was rhetorical. Yes, she had time on her hands. She wouldn’t be a casual mother, but too much planning had its perils, too, and she was nothing if not alive to the perils. The baby, the baby so long desired, the baby reluctant or eager, ready or not, was never consulted. At night in bed, her long warm body nestled along his long warm body insistently stirring, his arm around her waist and breath hot on her neck, she wanted to shake herself free of the future and fuck, but the baby, the unborn baby whose room was ready but whose parents were not, the baby was sleeping in ignorance too near, too lightly, and might wake if she did, might wake into fear in a dark room unfamiliar alone. She took his hand in hers and pressed it to her breast and hoped he’d fall asleep. The husband had no idea what she thought. He figured it was something to do with the nursery and painted it seven times over, once as an aquarium, once as a baseball diamond with fans in the stands, never guessing it was him she wanted to remodel. He had his visions of the future, too, and I grew tired of telling them their visions didn’t reconcile. They think next year may be the year. I hope for the baby’s sake.
Copyright © April 24, 2007 David Hodges
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 25, 2007 at 2:57 am
Wizzer
David, this is deeply touching for one who “knows”. I’m not sure the reason for no baby (him or life) but either way for anyone who has been there this is so accurate. Congratulations.
Thank you, Wizzer. Of course, the reason why is an open question that needs to stay open.
–David
April 25, 2007 at 2:59 am
Wizzer
Incidentally, is there a relationship between “Wake the Baby” & “Complaints”? In reality I believe there is but chronologically (your order of publishing) reversed.
It’s an interesting question, but nothing I intentionally planned.
–David
April 25, 2007 at 9:22 am
Sprite
I think I know the outcome. What does she do? She follows her vision and thinks he is along for the ride. He waits for her to return to who and what she was but her focus is elsewhere. It’s an “old shoe” thing. Ultimately, counseling or no, he has an affair. She may or may not find out. She may never know. How long does that affair continue? As long as the “other woman” allows it? Perhaps he needs both. Perhaps they all do… without admitting it. *SNAP* David, where do you send my brain? You’re gifted you know. 🙂
That’s fantastic, Sprite. Very inventive.
–David
April 25, 2007 at 3:02 pm
atatude
You sure packed a lot into 299 words. The story reminds me of when my wife and I were trying to get pregnant. Lots of conflicting emotions that I never experienced during sex, before or since. Thank god it only went on for 2 months.
Thanks, atatude! I know just what you mean.
–David
April 28, 2007 at 3:44 am
litlove
I do love the way that the couple’s fantasies about each other and their situation make them incomprehensible to one another. And you position the reader so cleverly, David, so we have a privileged position over their past, present and future. Beautifully done as ever!
Thank you, Litlove. Readers should always have the most privileged position! I always try to share as much omniscience as I can.
–David
May 1, 2007 at 7:02 pm
briseis
This one is beautiful, David. Stunning, too, in the way that it unveils her mind.
Thank you, Briseis. I love it when a limited-perspective narrator slowly divulges more than he should rightly know.
–David
May 2, 2007 at 10:41 pm
briseis
You always know more than you’ve right or reason to, David. 🙂 It’s only fair that some of your narrators should, too.
Aren’t you sweet! Thank you, Briseis.
–David