People and things are so easy to lose it’s a wonder we end up anywhere with anything to show. The future too is insecure and can be misplaced as easily as the little pocket items of the past—more easily in fact because each step misguides us from a place we’ll never reach and people we might have bumped into directly we see instead only peripherally if at all and without knowing them as we pass by beyond their embrace. At least that’s how it seems to a teenager in love with love. It all sounds very lonely on paper; instead, there are two people close at hand for every one we fail to meet. A boy whose Dad I cherish will die before he reaches my age; a man whose son’s devotion I love is already too old. I once closed my eyes and thought about life as a circle that whizzed around me like a gyroscope wheel while the axis it spun on spun on an axis in turn and I at the center had brief clear visions of all my alternative futures and was struck with dread. I came to clutching a flagpole in a park I’d never seen dizzy and screaming like a newborn upended and slapped. A bit unbalanced ever since, I wouldn’t think of shooting without a tripod. I take mostly pictures of wind and hang them here to sell. This gallery seems real enough, but it’s already memory and smoke and this lovely boy and his dear Dad are breezes through the laundry on the line, unseen movers of a heart no realer than mine. I love them both, swear to Christ I do, but with the right f/stop and a too-quick fix I could make it all look very dark indeed.
Copyright © November 15, 2007 David Hodges
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 15, 2007 at 12:47 pm
grantman
“I take mostly pictures of wind and hang them here to sell. This gallery seems real enough, but it’s already memory and smoke..” Now that is writing…. you did it again ! There must be something in the water !!!
great job
Grantman
Very kind, Grantman. Thank you so much. I’d like to recommend to my readers that they follow your link back to Boomerang and check out your “Geo’s 299’s.” I don’t know where you got the inspiration to write them (ha-ha), but I’m sure fans of very short fiction will enjoy them.
–David
November 16, 2007 at 12:30 pm
Wizzer
Wow, that’s a very bewildered individual. Probably thinks too much! Found the pace of this one faster than usual – love her ability to change the mood with a camera.
Thanks, Wizzer. Maybe you were one of those teenagers, too, who knows how lighting and angle can alter what’s real?
–David
November 18, 2007 at 12:02 pm
litlove
Susan Sontag thought photos were stencils off the real, Roland Barthes thought they were slices of death, and I do like your image of them here as split second choreographies of chance. But I also really like that last line, where we’re reminded of all the manipulation that goes into art.
Stencils is good because it preserves the shape but not the color. Slices of death is just a Frenchman’s way of saying “I’m bored. Let’s talk about something else.” But choreographies of chance I really like, especially here where the photographer wants to capture what’s fleeting and is so alert to happenstance. Thank you, Litlove!
–David
November 20, 2007 at 8:59 am
modoathii
wow!
Thanks.
–David