The Computative Assistant to the Acting Vice-Director of Apportionment Compliance for the local subdistrict stopped counting. For an hour he did nothing but stare at his screen and its pattern of numbers that veiled the white certainty beyond. Keys clicked throughout the office except at his desk. Over several fiscal quarters, he had not thought about the purpose for his computations. Results had occurred to straightforward data out of simple operations and formed neat stacks of finished work product that met their own needs. He’d known he was finished when the last page printed. But an hour into his day, the day he stopped counting, he read the number 4774 as Allah. It was all he could see. The inconceivability of there being not just one but several meanings for the pointless signifiers in the innumerable columns took his breath away. Other words appeared, both more and less meaningful than the one that had broken the code. By the end of the day, he had produced nothing new that would pass as work, so he submitted a second copy of the previous day’s reports. The following day, he did the same. It was all he could do to choose a route to the office. The path of his commute was a geometry of turns which, seen from above, spelled words he could almost decipher. The first word of each page of a book read through told the story of man in a sentence. At the same time, nothing meant anything it was intended to mean. Not a consequence followed from his new approach to apportionment computation, but from his clear-eyed reading of the same report each day and from his openness to every meaning of which each sign is capable came a richness of awareness that was utterly incapacitating.
Copyright © August 27, 2009 David Hodges
This work by davidbdale is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at davidbdale.wordpress.com.
13 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 28, 2009 at 2:56 am
petesmama
Incapacitating was a good word to end this with! The idea of all this has overloaded my brain!
Sit quietly in a chair for awhile, petesmama. Walking might be dangerous.
–David
August 28, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Dave Hambidge
One of your best, sir!
I did wonder if CAAVDAC could be read in a different way, but I can’t make it work?
best, dave
Good one, dave. That’s way cleverer than me.
–David
August 28, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Lynn Priestley
Hi David – Just discovered your site. LOVE it…will be back for more…
Hi, Lynn. I’m very happy to hear that. Now, send me thousands of your closest friends, please, and Welcome to Very Short Novels!
–David
August 28, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Lynn Priestley
Shall put your link on my blog….how’s that?
I’d be delighted, Lynn, but you should also be providing your own link when you comment, so others can click back to your blog directly (it’s only fair).
–David
August 30, 2009 at 3:57 am
Lynn Priestley
Well – allow me to link away then
http://lynnpriestley.wordpress.com
Thanks, David – though I don’t know if this will come up as a link…it’s now in the hands of the IT Gods…
It will surely show up as a link now that I’ve moved it to the fill-in field in the comment box. Next time your leave a comment, put the link in the field marked: URL. And thank you, of course, for your loyal persistence. Now, everybody else, go visit Lynn.
–David
September 1, 2009 at 3:33 am
Lynn Priestley
Bless you for that!
Achoo!
–David
August 30, 2009 at 9:40 pm
grantman
Your topic is one we all used to talk about a lot. but somehow now seems to have gotten lost amoung the daily grind of making a living… that of getting lost in an endless sea of data and arriving at a point where we have no idea what is real or unreal anymore… Ground control to Major Tom…check your circuits….
good one
Grantman
Thanks, Grantman
I guess I’m still trying to work out the old questions.
–David
August 31, 2009 at 11:09 am
The Querulous Squirrel
As one who glimpsed the secrets of Biblical numerology in Hebrew as an adolescent, I have thought of these possibilities and then decided to give my brain a rest. Great story, wonderfully told.
Thank you, qs. I had that very model in mind, as you may have guessed, among others. What God worth knowing would hide Her revelations so diabolically?
–David
August 31, 2009 at 2:31 pm
The Querulous Squirrel
I hope you have seen the wonderful movie Pi.
I haven’t, squirrel, but on your recommendation I will. Thank you again.
–David
September 15, 2009 at 4:08 pm
polaris
David, you continue to amaze. This was wonderful. This story, or the mood it evokes, took me to Garcia Marquez (why?) in a single Proustian leap.
How did I miss this comment, polaris? Thank you so much. (It’s hard to imagine a more flattering leap.) Always wonderful to hear from you!
–David
September 15, 2009 at 11:39 pm
Rick.
Some people say all that others think but never say. You do too and how! Amazing.
Sometimes I go for the opposite. Thanks, Rick.
–David
October 7, 2009 at 6:32 pm
abraham
nice. a question: why do u call ur work a very short novel? does it really have those features of it?
tnx
Oh, I don’t know, abraham. It amuses me to call them Novels. You may certainly call them something else if you like.
–David
December 5, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Sarah
Who is the author of this book anyway? Is it David???
Yes, Sarah, it is always David. Thanks for the question, and welcome to Very Short Novels!
–David