Black and White each had doubts that the other existed, but for White the question had consequences. “At a minimum,” insisted Black from his seat on the tenure board, “Professor White should offer proof, before being declared permanent, that he temporarily is.” White replied, without indicating externally what his internal condition might be, that the question before the board was rightly “not whether White is but what White is,” as evidence for which his resume was “sufficient to form a justified true belief” of his qualification for the Epistemology chair. He clasped his hands behind his back and waited for the board’s reply. A board member coughed. White smelled peppermint. Black was unconvinced, or so White concluded from the smug look on Black’s face and the dismissive way he tossed the undisputed pages into the air. “The resume,” Black countered, was “evidence that paper exists, not White,” and that students who could be taught by paper would not pay tuition and therefore would not sustain White’s salary. “Perhaps,” Black suggested, “if all White can prove is his likelihood, he might agree to lecture on the likelihood that he will be paid?” Without replying directly, White suggested a thought experiment. “Close your eyes,” he told the board, “and the furniture of the world disappears.” The board closed their eyes. “This board room, your colleagues, the esteemed Chairman Black,” continued White, “even this gavel, solid though it seems to me whose eyes remain open, to you might be in doubt.” Black put out his hand and felt only the sound block on which the gavel had rested. He yanked his hand back and opened his eyes just as White brought the gavel loudly down. “Chairman Black has doubts,” White told the startled board, “but he will act as if gavels exist.”
This work by davidbdale is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at davidbdale.wordpress.com.
9 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 14, 2010 at 8:02 pm
Cascade Lily
Great existentialist concept, although I found it a little hard to read, particularly as you’ve chosen not to break up the text to help the reader. Maybe they’ll all be gazumped one day by Prof Grey?
Thanks, Lily. I admit the lack of paragraphs is a deliberate gambit to slow down reading. It either works or I haven’t learned yet that it doesn’t. Thank you for your visit and your comment and welcome to Very Short Novels.
–David
January 15, 2010 at 3:27 pm
Kim Batchelor
Epistemology (along with ontology) is one of those words I have to constantly look up as I was taught Philosophy in a community college setting. This is a great little story that captures the concept of existentialism better than anything I heard in my community college Philosophy class. (That bar is higher than you’d think.) As someone who is married to a college professor, it also illustrates the tenure process very well.
I sort of agree with Lily in that I think breaking up the lines and creating a little more of a staccato feel might actually add to the narrative. You might try it and see. Otherwise, I wouldn’t change anything.
Thanks, Kim. If I managed to make an esoteric topic entertaining for you, I’ve done my job. Welcome to Very Short Novels!
–David
January 17, 2010 at 6:22 am
mazzz_in_Leeds
Thank you for messing with my head… ow.
🙂
I’ve got to that age where I feel I should try reading some philosophy, and you’ve reminded me that I was intending to start doing it this January!
Thanks, Maria. I don’t know whether to encourage you or simply apologize. I do appreciate your comment and welcome you to Very Short Novels. What an amazing collection of stories you have back at Mazzz in Leeds, and a very impressive following of satisfied commenters. Congratulations. So happy you’ve joined us here.
–David
January 19, 2010 at 8:18 am
mazzz_in_Leeds
about an hour’s worth of philosophy reading was completed on Sunday, would you believe!
Thank you for visiting my site too!
Well, what do you know! I’d say “my work here is done,” but that won’t be true until I’ve completed 299 of these little novelties. Soon, though. Pick up Philosophical Grammar if you dare!
–David
January 17, 2010 at 8:56 pm
~Tim
I really like the concept. I agree that it would have been easier to read if the text were broken up.
Thanks, Tim, and welcome to Very Short Novels. 299 words, no paragraph breaks. Other than that, we’re very flexible here. Please come back and let me know what you think of the other 270 or so. 🙂
–David
January 18, 2010 at 11:22 am
CJ
This reminded me of some of the dialogue in Alice in Wonderland or Through the Looking Glass, coupled with Black & White… I enjoyed it immensely!
In a land where people are forever losing their heads, it is sensible to act as if you believe in axes! Good catch, CJ. Thank you for your visit and your comment and Welcome to Very Short Novels!
–David
January 18, 2010 at 4:48 pm
Skycycler
What a lovely line: “A board member coughed. White smelled peppermint.”
It felt like a stepping stone in the midst of this stream with which to ford the rest. I like White’s clever demonstration too. Nice.
Welcome to #fridayflash David.
~Simon.
Thank you, Simon. What a perceptive comment and perfectly apt metaphor. I wanted also to offer the briefest example of causative deduction. White and we reasonably conclude the board member was sucking a mint, but that’s just between you and me; don’t tell anyone else. I do feel welcome at fridayflash, and hope you will feel equally welcome at Very Short Novels!
–David
January 19, 2010 at 10:07 am
J. M. Strother
An interesting and bemusing piece. Philosophical discussions are fun, but can make my head spin.
I’m intrigued with your concept of very short novels. I’m curious what drove the 299 word limit and lack of paragraph breaks.
Welcome to #fridayflash.
~jon
Thanks, Jon, and Welcome to Very Short Novels. There was no particular significance to 299 words when I started. Now, though, I not only compose to this length, I have completed the transition to thinking in this length. As for the lack of paragraphs, I’m convinced sentences have more resonance when the reader wrestles to place them with their neighbors. We flashers ask so little of our readers’ time and none of their money. I think they owe us.
–David
January 19, 2010 at 8:45 pm
Laura Eno
I would agree with CJ in the Through the Looking Glass feel. It is best to believe. 🙂 Welcome to #fridayflash!
Thank you, Laura. I understand. It’s hard to write about logic without reminding readers of Lewis Carroll. This fridayflash group is very warm and welcoming. Thank you and welcome to Very Short Novels.
–David