As I packed my bags for Chrysalis House, I reviewed conflicting reports from staff whose clients, all old, had achieved 100 years or more and begun the change. I make no claim to their veracity. Some on the floors had started a third set of teeth, I read. Two, long bald, were showing the eruption of something between feathers and fur, well distributed and slick. First, though, they had gone through comas from which they were not expected to emerge, each lasting 168 days during which their skin hardened, then cracked, then shed. One young nurse described the effect as “rotten fruit peeling itself.” There had been no reports from the facility since the first awakening and all the evidence I had was from staff who had quit or been released. I understand the objections. My predictions anticipated these events; hence, I fulfill my own prophecies; still, among us now, inconceivable a hundred years ago, are half a million centenarians. They cluster in places like Chrysalis. One-in-a-million events will soon be commonplace there and administrators would be wise to get ready. None of the newly emerged could speak but some, before the isolation floor was closed to any but the most senior staff, had heard coos as from well-fed infants, while others described sounds using animal metaphors. In the end, I was denied access, partly because of the furor my paper had roused at the annual conference. Now I hear in the Balkans there are fresh cases of something not quite us. This time I won’t request permission, but storm the floor. No one is better equipped to describe the shape of what comes next, which parts of it are older than man, which come to replace him, which have never appeared in our dreams they are so new.
Copyright © August 8, 2008 David Hodges
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 8, 2008 at 9:03 pm
briseis
Hmm, that’s a rather lovely thought. To live for so long that most people would say they’ve seen it all, and then to experience something entirely new and foreign and lovely. And, to be in a coma for the ‘puberty’ stage! 😀
Really, a lovely–if a little macabre–story.
I’d love to read the narrator’s paper, which had the spark to ignite such ‘furor.’
Well, we can hope the next stage is lovely. I guess time will tell, Briseis. Thank you so much.
–David
August 9, 2008 at 4:40 pm
briseis
All things are lovely, if you look at them correctly.
That sounds so convincing when you say it. Thank you, Briseis.
–David
August 14, 2008 at 1:54 pm
litlove
I don’t know about lovely; I rather thought this was a graphic and skin-crawling description of the horrors that science might be tempted to produce in order to prolong human life beyond its natural limits. Something that hovers oh so close to our forseeable future and which we ought to treat (just as this vsn does) with circumspection. I really liked the title – there’s nothing much ‘proper’ as in properly pertaining to the human about this little house of horrors, is there?
I like that reading very much, Litlove. It gets right at the core of my disquiet about how we might be evolving. I like Briseis’ hopeful acceptance too. Imagine how the humans of several thousand years ago might have considered us and the world we’ve created. Would they be filled with admiration or appalled?
–David
August 21, 2008 at 11:50 am
Wizzer at Guru fodder
I see you are in a playful mood David – Chrysalis House indeed!
I too am disturbed with the thought that genetic engineering could create this reality. Your comment to litlove sent a chill up my spine – who indeed has created the world in which we live?
It’s also possible we are larvae and this is simply nature taking its course. Thanks, Wizzer.
–David